Postby Kathryn-in-Canada » Mon Sep 22, 2014 9:07 am
The reason I stopped using a digital scale was that it would not register a new number if the previous weigh-in was within 2 lbs. So while it displayed in .1 pound amounts, it wasn't necessarily that accurate. Dh and I were weighing ourselves daily so it was working fine until I got within one pound of dh (he's always been lighter than me.)
An example of what I mean:
I weighed 139. He weighed 137.5. He'd weigh himself. I'd get on the scale and weigh the same. In order to get my weight, I'd have to pick up 4 lbs in weights, weigh myself, put down the weights and weigh myself again. Only then would the 139 appear. In other words, each time I weighed myself, I had to weigh myself twice (once with weights, once without.)
To see if your scales have this flaw, pick up bottle of water or something else weighing under a pound and step on the scales after weighing yourself and see if your weight changed.
This was a $100 digital scale with body fat measurement, not cheap, but in the end, useless to me. It also had the same flaw when I was trying to weigh my suitcase before a flight, since removing a pound of contents made no difference unless I weighed myself in between to reset the scale.
I wanted a proper scale like doctors have with weights but they cost too much and took up too much room so we settled on a good, old fashioned, non-electronic scale. And I stick with it. It doesn't track anything under .5 pounds (the dial isn't that fine) but I can estimate half pound amounts. It will give me the same reading two times in a row, which is what I was looking for in a scale, although if I step on with my left foot first, it gives me a different reading than when I step on with my right foot!
Since I'm not using the scale for something like a diet bet, I'm just looking for overall trends. Or to be exact, overall DOWNWARD trends!